100 Agencies: Compass Healthcare Marketers

Share this article:
Peter Nalen, president-CEO
Peter Nalen, president-CEO

Considering how much doom, gloom and bitter if not desperate competition have marked the pharma marketplace recently, Peter Nalen, president-CEO of Compass Healthcare Marketers, stands out. For one thing, it sounds like he's having fun. Credit that in no small part to his agency's recent refocusing on drugs for rare and orphan diseases.

“What's fun and interesting about this market is that there's no real competitors—usually there's only one brand per category,” he said, speaking of a few thought-leadership events Compass produced last year. Rare diseases affect fewer than 200,000 people, while orphan diseases are those that likely won't yield an economic benefit for drugmakers and so receive regulatory incentives. “People don't look across the aisle and say, ‘I have to kill you.' We're all facing the same problems. When it's industry-only and just commercial folks in the room, they're free and open to ask questions.”

 

Compass's change, which Nalen calls “more an evolution than a revolution,” began in 2010. But his passion for patients goes way back. His brother's fatal struggle with liposarcoma—initially misdiagnosed—was the impetus for the agency. Nalen said, “We started the agency nine years ago on the belief that if patients had better information they'd be in the position to make better decisions, and they'd have better outcomes.”

At this point, about 95% of Compass's clients are in the rare and orphan drug space. In 2011, Compass won new accounts from Upsher-Smith Laboratories, Raptor Pharmaceutical (an unnamed Nephropathic cystinosis drug), Chelsea Therapeutics (Northera), and the agency is doing social media and landscape analysis for GlaxoSmithKline in the areas of Fabry's disease and Duchenne muscular dystrophy. The sole loss was Dey Pharma, which, Nalen explained, was a result of the Mylan acquisition and the ensuing agency consolidation.  “We were the last one to go,” he said.

Nalen declined to disclose growth figures, but said this: “We're averaging anywhere between 10 and 18% year-over-year for the last five years. 2009 was okay and 2010 was unbelievably good. 2011 had slight growth, but that was because we repositioned, and it took a little while to get new clients to know who we were.”  Compass employs 30 people, with two open positions.

Compass's repositioning has come with an evolution of the products and services. “Interactive is at our core and that's where 90% of the community is looking for information,” Nalen said.  There's also a community-engagement group focused on reaching the patient community, from advocacy groups to patients, on behalf of clients. Compass employs much the same staff that it did before the positioning, though last year it  opened a California office that now has six people.

The California move was to get even closer to the biotech and specialty pharma community there, but the shift to rare and orphan has led to more interest from the big boys. “Funnily enough, this positioning puts big pharma on our radar more than before,” he said.

Nalen notes that each of the top ten pharma companies except Genentech has a rare and orphan group. “It's a smart place to be as we fall off the blockbuster cliff. We'll see how it pans out. As long as they come in with the right intentions, it shouldn't hurt the space. A lot of the smaller biotech companies are a little nervous. The playbook is to steal market share by pricing.”
Share this article:
You must be a registered member of MMM to post a comment.
close

Next Article in Features

Email Newsletters

MM&M EBOOK: PATIENT ACCESS

Patient access to pharmaceuticals is a tale of two worlds—affordability has improved for the majority, while the minority is hampered by cost, distribution and red tape. To provide marketers with a well-rounded perspective, MM&M presents this e-book chock full of key insights. Click here to access it.

More in Features

Is your marketing strategy stuck in 2005?

Is your marketing strategy stuck in 2005?

It is not enough to just have a killer black book or Rolodex. The market needs agile, swift marketing

Is guidance stifling social media?

Recent FDA draft guidance was meant to help companies create FDA-compliant tweets and handle third-party misinformation on the web. What other obstacles lie in the path of effective social media use?

FDA social media guides draw flak

FDA social media guides draw flak

Two FDA guidance documents on how health product manufacturers may participate in social media have drawn criticism from industry and consumer groups.