Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and Herb Kohl (D-WI) released a somewhat
softer version of their Physician Payments Sunshine Act while praising Eli
Lilly & Co. for endorsing the legislation.
The bill, as currently written, would impose significantly
lower penalties than the $10,000 to $100,000 per violation in the original legislation.
It distinguishes between “knowing failure to report,” for which companies may
be fined up to $50,000 per violation, capped at $250,000 per year, and
unintended omissions, which can cost companies $1,000-$5,000 or up
to $50,000 per year. The bill would pre-empt state reporting requirements, some
of which would be more stringent, and information would be posted online,
through a publicly accessible HHS website.
By contrast, for a single infraction, whether willful or
not, its House counterpart would not only levy fines but bar companies from
taking tax deductions on advertising for a year, potentially costing them
millions.
The revised Senate bill would also give companies several
years to get themselves in compliance. The original version would have been
effective immediately.
In a statement, Grassley, who is ranking member of the
Senate Committee on Finance, said: “Eli Lilly deserves credit for its
endorsement of the Sunshine Act and its leadership role it is taking for
greater transparency in the pharmaceutical industry….The company's
forward-looking endorsement of legislation to require reporting of financial
relationships between drug and device makers and physicians will be valuable in
building more support for this important reform.”
Lilly weighed in on behalf of the revised bill yesterday,
with president and CEO John Lechleiter saying in a statement: “Lilly welcomes
greater transparency in the healthcare system and believes this legislation
represents an important step in building public trust and confidence in the
relationships between the pharmaceutical and device industries and physicians.
Lilly intends to continue to build upon its leadership position in
transparency. In addition to our publicly available clinical trial and
educational grant registries, we continue to look at other ways to open up our
business to the public. This will help provide the assurance that Lilly runs
its business consistent not only with our principles, but with the principles
that a healthcare provider or patient should expect from a pharmaceutical
company.”
Lilly has made clinical trials and clinical trials data
public since 2004 and last year began posting information on its med ed grants
online.
The bill was also endorsed by the Association of American
Medical Colleges.