Abbott CME use led to Depakote fine

Share this article:

The steady stream of big pharma firms settling with the feds and states for alleged off-label marketing continued with Abbott Labs in May.

Abbott's $1.6-billion payment package—second only to Pfizer's $2.3 billion Bextra penalty of 2009—resolves allegations that the drugmaker used a multifaceted strategy to expand prescriptions for CNS drug Depakote beyond the med's three approved uses (bipolar, epilepsy and migraine prevention) to include controlling agitation and aggression in elderly dementia patients.

Not only was Abbott flagged for inducing its sales force as well as long-term care pharmacies to achieve that end, court papers assert that, from 1998 through 2006, it “improperly and unduly” influenced the content of company sponsored CME programs, in violation of anti-kickback laws.

Abbott pled guilty to a criminal misdemeanor for misbranding Depakote. As part of a five-year probation period, the firm agreed to ensure that CME grant-making decisions are not controlled by sales and marketing, a no-no according to 2005 OIG guidelines.

It also signed a five-year corporate integrity agreement requiring, among other things, that Abbott post on its website information about payments to doctors. Breaching the CIA could result in exclusion from federal healthcare programs, including Medicare and Medicaid, and/or monetary penalties.
Share this article:
You must be a registered member of MMM to post a comment.

Email Newsletters


Patient access to pharmaceuticals is a tale of two worlds—affordability has improved for the majority, while the minority is hampered by cost, distribution and red tape. To provide marketers with a well-rounded perspective, MM&M presents this e-book chock full of key insights. Click here to access it.

More in Features

Read the complete September 2014 Digital Edition

Read the complete September 2014 Digital Edition

Click the above link to access the complete Digital Edition of the August 2014 issue of MM&M, with all text, charts and pictures.

Medical marketing needs mainstream Mad Men

Medical marketing needs mainstream Mad Men

Agencies must generate emotional resonance with the target audience, not unlike Apple, Pepsi or Nike

Are discounts cutting out co-pays?

GSK's decision to cut Advair's price spurred some PBMs to put it back on formulary. Will drugmaker discounts diminish the need for loyalty programs? How can these programs stay relevant beyond giving co-pay assistance?