As I see it: Reorganizing the FDA means sweeping changes

Share this article:
Whether or not Congress elects to reorganize the FDA, the Obama Administration's new leadership team at the agency vows sweeping changes are on the way, from drug safety to more transparency in everything the agency does.

In June, newly installed commissioner Margaret Hamburg and principal deputy commissioner Joshua Sharfstein held their first news conference to roll out Sharfstein's pet project, an executive-level task force on transparency.
While very broadly focused and a response to Obama's first-day directive to all agencies to be more transparent, the FDA task force's primary initial spur was the cascading public criticisms the agency has been getting over its slowness to release early drug safety concerns.

Despite the change in administrations, this is likely to remain a contentious subject. Industry does not want its products prematurely maligned, and the FDA does not want to be caught protecting an avoidable hazard.
Congressional overseers, suspecting that Bush-era holdovers with pro-industry agendas have embedded themselves in Obama's FDA, can be expected to hold the agency's feet to the fire on this one.

Even the task force itself quickly met criticism for its composition — numerically dominated by officials who helped build the non-transparent structures and procedures they are now charged with dismantling.

No one doubts the dedication of Sharfstein, who is chairing the task force, to transparency. Nor has Hamburg been lukewarm in her support for the effort, which has the full weight of Obama's Day 1 directive behind it.
But this is an extraordinarily impervious agency with a decades-long culture of secretiveness and stubbornness. Some of the secrecy is necessary and legally mandated — protecting trade secrets and patient privacy, for instance — but acres of it are ingrained, cover-your-ass encrustations that serve to resist reform and preserve personal fiefdoms.

As one old FDA hand told me when Reagan took office with a government reform agenda: “Commissioners come and commissioners go — but we stay here.” And so do their habits.

Dickinson is editor of Dickinson's FDA Webview (
Share this article:
You must be a registered member of MMM to post a comment.

Email Newsletters

MM&M Future Leaders

Register now

Early bird $1,950 before 31 October 2014

*Group discounts available on request 


Patient access to pharmaceuticals is a tale of two worlds—affordability has improved for the majority, while the minority is hampered by cost, distribution and red tape. To provide marketers with a well-rounded perspective, MM&M presents this e-book chock full of key insights. Click here to access it.

More in As I See It

As I See It: Patient Centricity

As I See It: Patient Centricity

A patient who is diagnosed earlier and receives the most efficacious treatment is the least expensive

As I See It: FDA's social-media moves

As I See It: FDA's social-media moves

FDA has insisted that its antique regulations can address every new promotional challenge

As I See It: FDA and marketing materials

As I See It: FDA and marketing materials

The more clarity that FDA provides, the more confident companies can be in their medical communications