Companies view Sunshine differently

Share this article:
Pfizer
Pfizer

A report by PMLive indicates that pharmaceutical companies have distinct views on what the Sunshine Act requires.

According to a presentation made at the International Society for Medical Publications Professionals, PMLive noted, for example, that Pfizer and AstraZeneca report payments for medical writing. The companies said they report the payments because the publications represent value for the company and author.

Shire's publications director Antonia Panayi, though, said her company does not consider these publications reportable because the value is limited to pharma, as opposed to being beneficial for professionals.

Panayi said the value is limited to “what has already been paid as part of their contractual agreement for the trial,” and that author “kudos” for publication would be difficult to quantify.

Share this article:
You must be a registered member of MMM to post a comment.
close

Next Article in Business Briefs

Email Newsletters

MM&M Future Leaders


Register now

Early bird $1,950 before 31 October 2014

*Group discounts available on request 

MM&M EBOOK: PATIENT ACCESS

Patient access to pharmaceuticals is a tale of two worlds—affordability has improved for the majority, while the minority is hampered by cost, distribution and red tape. To provide marketers with a well-rounded perspective, MM&M presents this e-book chock full of key insights. Click here to access it.

More in Business Briefs

Genentech shift could prove costly for hospitals

Genentech will use specialty distributors rather than wholesalers, hospitals pharmacy directors have learned.

Novartis said to be stepping out of HCV

Novartis is said to have relinquished rights to an investigational hep. C treatment, signaling its exit from the therapeutic space, according to a former partner's announcement.

Monday Moves: September 15

Hires and promotions for manufacturers, regulatory and agencies