"Conditional approval" draws dissent

Share this article:

Could new drugs be less expensively and more rapidly brought to market if premarket clinical trials for proof of effectiveness were scaled back?

That has been the drumbeat from former FDA commissioner Andrew von Eschenbach, but former Pfizer R&D president John LaMattina disagrees.

In a Forbes online post, LaMattina said that the proposal would save money and get drugs to market faster, but at a cost of increased safety risks.

Now head of the Manhattan Institute's Project FDA initiative, von Eschenbach insists that reducing Phase 3 requirements “would be particularly effective for some chronic diseases.”

But LaMattina, who is also a senior partner at PureTech Ventures, writes that this “would likely result in more drug recalls and more liability costs.”

Phase 3 trials are needed to understand a drug's risk/benefit profile before it hits the market, LaMattina says. “The FDA does a good job in evaluating the risks and benefits for new drugs under the current paradigm,” he ­concludes.
Share this article:
close

Next Article in Features

Email Newsletters

More in Features

Antidote: On Cystic Fibrosis treatments

Antidote: On Cystic Fibrosis treatments

Recent treatments in CF, including the inhaled antibiotic Tobramycin, have increased lifespan well into adulthood.

The $3 generic and the $1,000 pill: pharma outsiders just don't get it

The $3 generic and the $1,000 pill: pharma ...

What do you call the people who treat medical breakthroughs as if they were bank heists? Malicious? Uninformed? Not with it?

Leadership Exchange Uncut : The Agency-Client Relationship

Leadership Exchange Uncut : The Agency-Client Relationship

Click the above link to access MM&M's first Leadership Exchange Uncut e-book, "The Agency-Client Relationship"