Court rules against IMS, SDI on NH data ban

Share this article:
Supreme Court shrugs at NH data ban
Supreme Court shrugs at NH data ban
A federal appeals court has overturned a lower court's injunction of New Hampshire's ban on commercial provision of prescription data, arguing that such restrictions do not constitute an abridgment of free speech.

Writing for the US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, Judge Bruce Selya said “we are not persuaded that the regulated data transfers embody restrictions on protected speech,” adding: “Unlike stereotypical commercial speech, new information is not filtered into the marketplace with the possibility of stimulating better informed consumer choice (after all, physicians already know their own prescribing histories) and the societal benefits flowing from the prohibited transactions pale in comparison to the negative externalities produced.”  

Two data companies, IMS Health and Verispan (now part of SDI), sued for an injunction against a New Hampshire law prohibiting the sale of prescribing data for use in pharmaceutical detailing, arguing that it violated their First Amendment rights. A US district court agreed with them. Today's decision overturns the district court injunction and opens the door to similar laws already on the books in Vermont and Maine and pending in two dozen more states.

In a joint statement, the data companies expressed disappointment with the decision and said they were evaluating potential next steps.
Share this article:
You must be a registered member of MMM to post a comment.

The Women's Health landscape is ripe with opportunity for pharma marketers. This seven-page eBook offers product managers a guide to capitalizing on the trends, growth areas and unmet needs. Includes alternative channels to engage OB/GYNs and oncologists, and plenty of tips. Click here to access it.