FDA: Bad Ad program tripled reports

Share this article:
Reports of allegedly misleading or untruthful promotion have more than tripled under the FDA's Bad Ad program, the agency said in a review of the program's first full year.
 
The agency received 328 reports over the year since the program's inception, in May 2010. Historically, reports averaged around 104 a year before Bad Ad was unveiled, with great fanfare and much coverage. Of the 328 reports since the program began with a letter to more than 33,000 physicians, 188 were submitted by healthcare professionals, while 116 came from consumers and 24 from regulated industry. Of the 188 from healthcare professionals, 87 were cleared for “comprehensive review, demonstrating a relatively strong level of knowledge in the medical community about what constitutes misleading promotion.” Twenty-four of the reports from consumers cleared that bar and 14 of those from industry. Those leads led to three warning letters and two untitled letters.

Just 4% of reports were submitted anonymously, the agency said, taking aim at industry critics who saw shades of a regulatory secret police in the program's use of anonymous reporting.

Going forward, the agency said “based on overwhelmingly positive feedback” it will expand the program through development of a web-based continuing education program, collaboration with medical schools and continued canvassing of trade shows such as those of the American Academy of Physician Assistants, the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners and the American Academy of Family Physicians.

Warning letters were issued to: Hill Dermaceuticals, for a “particularly egregious website” promoting Derma-Smoothe Body Oil; Three Rivers Pharmaceuticals for an Infergen direct mail piece that a clinical pharmacist reported; and Shire, for a Vyvanse magnet that “an astute nurse” flagged and which the agency found “was designed to hide the important risk information from plain view.” Untitled letters went to Forest Laboratories for statements made by a sales rep regarding fibromyalgia drug Savella, which the agency characterized as “representative of the types of promotion we hope to curtail in field-based settings,” and Warner Chilcott for a YouTube video depicting a violative detail of Atelvia.  
Share this article:
You must be a registered member of MMM to post a comment.

Email Newsletters

MM&M Future Leaders


Register now

Early bird $1,950 before 31 October 2014

*Group discounts available on request 

MM&M EBOOK: PATIENT ACCESS

Patient access to pharmaceuticals is a tale of two worlds—affordability has improved for the majority, while the minority is hampered by cost, distribution and red tape. To provide marketers with a well-rounded perspective, MM&M presents this e-book chock full of key insights. Click here to access it.

More in Channel

Five things for pharma marketers to know: Monday, September 15

Five things for pharma marketers to know: ...

Pharma has sought 76 meetings with FDA over biosimilars; Gilead licenses Sovaldi to India generic drugmakers; Pfizer and Ranbaxy Lipitor lawsuit dismissed.

Liraglutide, aiming for new indication, gets new name

Liraglutide, aiming for new indication, gets new name

Why Novo Nordisk is choosing not to leverage Victoza's brand equity as it seeks a weight-loss indication for liraglutide.

Five things for pharma marketers to know: Friday, September 12

Five things for pharma marketers to know: Friday, ...

An FDA panel voted in favor of liraglutide for weight loss; Allergan investors backing an attempted takeover of the firm crossed a critical threshold; and 100 million health wearables are ...