FDA wants another look at data for failed drugs

Share this article:
©Kantar Media ©JARScan ad images database
©Kantar Media ©JARScan ad images database

FDA's drugs center wants to revisit a proposal once entertained by PhRMA to allow the agency access to all data from failed drug development programs to research whether different approaches could have saved the products.

The idea was explored before, but an agreement was never reached. CDER deputy director for clinical science Bob Temple is pitching it again based on statements that the industry is more willing to share internal data.

Phase 3 failures continue at an alarming rate, Temple acknowledged during a joint FDA/Drug Information Association workshop on drug development in Bethesda, MD. These “destroy optimism,” he said, adding that at least 10 years ago there were discussions with PhRMA “about a completely open review of drugs that failed in Phase 3.”

Temple's pitch followed his presentation on how better dose-response data could have saved products removed from the market after approval. For example, Lotronex, for IBS associated with diarrhea, was pulled because of severe side effects at its original dose, but is back on the market at a reduced dose.
Share this article:
You must be a registered member of MMM to post a comment.
close

Next Article in Features

Email Newsletters

MM&M EBOOK: PATIENT ACCESS

Patient access to pharmaceuticals is a tale of two worlds—affordability has improved for the majority, while the minority is hampered by cost, distribution and red tape. To provide marketers with a well-rounded perspective, MM&M presents this e-book chock full of key insights. Click here to access it.

More in Features

Read the complete September 2014 Digital Edition

Read the complete September 2014 Digital Edition

Click the above link to access the complete Digital Edition of the August 2014 issue of MM&M, with all text, charts and pictures.

Medical marketing needs mainstream Mad Men

Medical marketing needs mainstream Mad Men

Agencies must generate emotional resonance with the target audience, not unlike Apple, Pepsi or Nike

Are discounts cutting out co-pays?

GSK's decision to cut Advair's price spurred some PBMs to put it back on formulary. Will drugmaker discounts diminish the need for loyalty programs? How can these programs stay relevant beyond giving co-pay assistance?