CME restriction bid rebuffed, again

A third attempt by an AMA ethics council asking physicians and medical institutions to curb industry funding for professional educational activities was rebuffed last month.

The proposals, contained in a report from AMA's Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs (CEJA), would have required CME providers to only accept funds from “sources that have no direct financial interest in a physician's clinical recommendations,” except in certain cases. At the AMA's semi-annual policymaking meeting, its House of Delegates voted to send the entire report back to CEJA for further study.

“The rejection by the House of Delegates shows a commitment to CME funding and academic freedom,” wrote Rockpointe president Thomas Sullivan in the blog Policy and Medicine.

At a committee meeting prior to the vote, 25 speakers representing 24 organizations spoke against adoption of the CEJA recommendations, according to Sullivan, while in favor were 10 speakers representing CEJA, the AMA's Council on Medical Education and other organizations.

The last time delegates sent a CEJA proposal back to committee was in June. That proposal sought to delineate “ethically preferable” or “ethically permissible” CME funding practices. A 2008 proposal—also shelved—had called for an all-out ban on commercial support.

In a statement, AMA chair Dr. Rebecca Patchin said CEJA “will re-examine the issue and present a revised report at a later meeting.”
You must be a registered member of MMM to post a comment.
close

Next Article in Features


Email Newsletters


Specialty medicines continue to be a hot category, one in which spending has surged behind products that treat medicine's most complex diseases. This eBook lays out the needs and hurdles along the specialty drug pathway, explaining how stakeholders are working to get meds into patients' hands and ease their experience. Click here to download.