GAO: FDA bureaucracy gums up DTC reviews

Share this article:
A Government Accountability Office report said the FDA has failed to implement an effective system for tracking and prioritizing reviews of DTC ads – and that the gap between reviews of violative ads and the issuance of regulatory letters continues to widen as a result. 

From 1997-2002, the report said, it took an average of two weeks for FDA to issue a regulatory letter. Since 2002, when the FDA implemented a policy change requiring internal legal review of all draft regulatory letters, the process has taken longer – four months, on average, from 2002-2005 – and fewer letters have been issued. In 2006 and 2007, average response time lengthened to more than five months. 

Two years ago, the GAO prodded the agency to begin tracking which ads were reviewed and develop a system for prioritizing reviews in order to promote more timely issuance of warning and untitled letters. The agency, said the report, has “indicated that it had documented criteria to prioritize reviews. However, FDA still does not systematically apply its criteria to all of the DTC materials it receives.” Furthermore, the agency has not yet implemented a system for identifying what ads have been reviewed, as the GAO recommended in 2006. 

In prepared remarks to Congress, GAO healthcare head Marcia Crosse praised the agency's development of prioritization criteria but knocked its failure to implement those criteria and track reviews. “Despite FDA agreeing in 2002 that it is important to issue regulatory letters more quickly, the amount of time it takes to draft and issue letters has continued to lengthen,” said Cross. “We believe that delays in issuing regulatory letters limit FDA's effectiveness in overseeing DTC advertising and in reducing consumers' exposure to false and misleading advertising.”
Share this article:
You must be a registered member of MMM to post a comment.

Next Article in Channel


Patient access to pharmaceuticals is a tale of two worlds—affordability has improved for the majority, while the minority is hampered by cost, distribution and red tape. To provide marketers with a well-rounded perspective, MM&M presents this e-book chock full of key insights. Click here to access it.

More in Channel

Five things for pharma marketers to know: Monday, September 15

Five things for pharma marketers to know: ...

Pharma has sought 76 meetings with FDA over biosimilars; Gilead licenses Sovaldi to India generic drugmakers; Pfizer and Ranbaxy Lipitor lawsuit dismissed.

Liraglutide, aiming for new indication, gets new name

Liraglutide, aiming for new indication, gets new name

Why Novo Nordisk is choosing not to leverage Victoza's brand equity as it seeks a weight-loss indication for liraglutide.

Five things for pharma marketers to know: Friday, September 12

Five things for pharma marketers to know: Friday, ...

An FDA panel voted in favor of liraglutide for weight loss; Allergan investors backing an attempted takeover of the firm crossed a critical threshold; and 100 million health wearables are ...