Harvard urges faculty to ditch journals

Share this article:
Harvard urges faculty to ditch journals
Harvard urges faculty to ditch journals
An email from Harvard University's Faculty Advisory Council over the cost of professional journals has touched off the latest round in the Universities vs Publishers sparring match. In an email distributed to faculty last week the council said publishers have “made the scholarly communication environment fiscally unsustainable and academically restrictive.” The note says the university spends $3.8 million on journals every year, with some costing as much as $40,000. The council also says that the library is also hamstrung by costs associated with bundled purchases in which libraries buy collections of titles as opposed to individual ones, and that online access is not a fiscal solution, noting that two unnamed providers have increased online subscription fees at a rate that outpaces the consumer price index.

The council is urging faculty to submit articles to open-access journals or to journals with “reasonable, sustainable subscription costs" and counsels them to demand subscription contracts that can be made public, opt out of bundles and buy high-demand journals ala carte. The council is also pressing faculty to resign from the editorial boards of costly journals.

Harvard did not return calls by press time and did not identify any specific publishers. However, Elsevier and Nature Publishing Group told MM&M that they have good relationships with Harvard that offer flexibility.

“Libraries are never forced to take ‘bundled' packages," said Tom Reller, a spokesperson for Elsevier. "They always have options to purchase individual articles, subscribe to titles or to sets of journals." Reller added that libraries benefit from large collections because they receive volume discounts and that “approximately 40% of researchers' usage is of journal titles that the library had previously not subscribed to.”

Nature Publishing Group's Patrick Carpenter told MM&M that Harvard licenses its content through the NorthEast Research Libraries Consortium, which provides user licenses for a pool of 28 research centers, and that the Harvard and NPG have a good relationship. Carpenter said he is not aware of Harvard raising any price concerns with NPG. He also said bundling isn't an issue for consortium members, because they “do not have forced bundles.” He added that if NERL offers bundles it also provides an ala carte option.

Tensions between academia and publishers have been brewing for some time, as evidenced by the recent dust-up between Elsevier and Cambridge University professor Timothy Gowers. His protest against the publisher now has over 10,000 supporters who have vowed to withhold services. NPG was the target of a protest just two years ago, when the University of California system threatened a boycott with subscription rates set to jump 400%.
Share this article:
You must be a registered member of MMM to post a comment.

MM&M EBOOK: PATIENT ACCESS

Patient access to pharmaceuticals is a tale of two worlds—affordability has improved for the majority, while the minority is hampered by cost, distribution and red tape. To provide marketers with a well-rounded perspective, MM&M presents this e-book chock full of key insights. Click here to access it.

More in Channel

Five things for pharma marketers to know: Monday, September 15

Five things for pharma marketers to know: ...

Pharma has sought 76 meetings with FDA over biosimilars; Gilead licenses Sovaldi to India generic drugmakers; Pfizer and Ranbaxy Lipitor lawsuit dismissed.

Liraglutide, aiming for new indication, gets new name

Liraglutide, aiming for new indication, gets new name

Why Novo Nordisk is choosing not to leverage Victoza's brand equity as it seeks a weight-loss indication for liraglutide.

Five things for pharma marketers to know: Friday, September 12

Five things for pharma marketers to know: Friday, ...

An FDA panel voted in favor of liraglutide for weight loss; Allergan investors backing an attempted takeover of the firm crossed a critical threshold; and 100 million health wearables are ...