Industry-backed trials are positive

Share this article:
An analysis of studies registered on ClinicalTrials.gov showed those funded by industry were more apt to show positive outcomes but less apt to be published shortly after completion than trials funded by other sources.

Out of 546 trials, noted researchers writing in Annals of Internal Medicine, industry-funded trials reported positive outcomes in 85% of publications vs. 50% for government-funded trials, and 72% for nonprofits or non-federal organization-funded trials. The rate of publication within two years of study completion ranged from 32% among industry-funded trials to 56% among nonprofit or nonfederal organization–funded trials without industry contributions.
Share this article:
You must be a registered member of MMM to post a comment.
close

Next Article in Features

Email Newsletters

More in Features

Read the complete September 2014 Digital Edition

Read the complete September 2014 Digital Edition

Click the above link to access the complete Digital Edition of the August 2014 issue of MM&M, with all text, charts and pictures.

Medical marketing needs mainstream Mad Men

Medical marketing needs mainstream Mad Men

Agencies must generate emotional resonance with the target audience, not unlike Apple, Pepsi or Nike

Are discounts cutting out co-pays?

GSK's decision to cut Advair's price spurred some PBMs to put it back on formulary. Will drugmaker discounts diminish the need for loyalty programs? How can these programs stay relevant beyond giving co-pay assistance?