Industry ties may expand indications

Share this article:

A study of government drug review advisory panels suggests that those with members who have financial ties to the drug industry recommended expansion of labeled disease indications for the drugs examined.

Published in the online journal PLOS Medicine, the study by six Australian physicians sought to identify guidelines in which disease definitions were changed, and the extent of panel members' industry ties.

They looked at publications between 2000 and 2013 from guideline panels making decisions about definitions or diagnostic criteria for common conditions in the US. Of 16 publications on 14 conditions, 10 proposed changes widening and one narrowing definitions. Among panels with disclosure, the average proportion of members with ties was 75%.

The authors found that diagnostic thresholds are being lowered by panels dominated by those with financial ties to multiple companies that may benefit from those decisions, raising questions about current processes of disease definition.
Share this article:
close

Next Article in Agency Gallery

Email Newsletters

More in Agency Gallery

Private View: Creating Compelling Experiences

Private View: Creating Compelling Experiences

In today's multi-channel environment, game-changing ideas blend creativity and sensory ideation to create a meaningful customer experience

Putting consumers at the center of your universe

Putting consumers at the center of your universe

The question should be: How do you simplify and identify the moments that mean the most to customers?

Did "pay-to-play" confab help Zohydro approval?

Did "pay-to-play" confab help Zohydro approval?

US senators Joe Manchin (D-WV) and David Vitter (R-LA) are asking whether a "pay-to-play" meeting between drug industry executives and FDA officials influenced the agency's approval of Zohydro