Iowa state Senate passes harsh gifts and Rx data ban

Share this article:
Iowa's state Senate passed a healthcare bill containing some of the toughest restrictions on drug company contacts with physicians yet.

Senate File 389, which passed by a vote of 30-18 in March, must still pass through the state's House of Representatives and be signed into law by the governor.

The bill would establish an “insurance exchange” and expand public health insurance for children. 

This bill would also establish an “evidence-based drug education program,” require that companies report all payments to physicians and helathcare professionals for continuing education and clinical research and ban on all other gifts and compensation, along with the provision of prescribing data for commercial purposes.

Manufacturers, wholesalers and agents acting on their behalf would be prohibited from offering any gift to healthcare practitioners under the bill, with exception to: payments to sponsors of “significant educational, scientific or policy-making conference or seminar,” provided the payment is not made directly to a practitioner; “Reasonable honoraria and payment of the reasonable expenses” of faculty at such conferences or seminars “pursuant to an explicit contract with specific deliverables which are restricted to scientific issues, not marketing efforts”; and compensation for “bona fide clinical trials.”

The bill requires manufacturers to disclose to the state's department of administrative services an annual report on all gifts or payments covered under the exemptions to the prohibition.

The disclosure of individual identifying information for the marketing of prescribed products would be banned, and violators could be fined up to $50,000.

The Iowa law is, in some respects, even harsher than the Massachusetts bill passed earlier in March, which includes prohibitions on most gifts and meals for healthcare practitioners from drug and device companies, tough reporting requirements and an “opt out” provision allowing prescribers to withhold their prescribing data from commercial use. Similar laws are pending in a number of states. 
Share this article:
You must be a registered member of MMM to post a comment.

Email Newsletters


Patient access to pharmaceuticals is a tale of two worlds—affordability has improved for the majority, while the minority is hampered by cost, distribution and red tape. To provide marketers with a well-rounded perspective, MM&M presents this e-book chock full of key insights. Click here to access it.

More in Features

Read the complete September 2014 Digital Edition

Read the complete September 2014 Digital Edition

Click the above link to access the complete Digital Edition of the August 2014 issue of MM&M, with all text, charts and pictures.

Medical marketing needs mainstream Mad Men

Medical marketing needs mainstream Mad Men

Agencies must generate emotional resonance with the target audience, not unlike Apple, Pepsi or Nike

Are discounts cutting out co-pays?

GSK's decision to cut Advair's price spurred some PBMs to put it back on formulary. Will drugmaker discounts diminish the need for loyalty programs? How can these programs stay relevant beyond giving co-pay assistance?