JAMA analysis stirs debate

Share this article:
A JAMA analysis questioning the effectiveness of antidepressants has renewed debate.

The meta-analysis found that antidepressents are useful for those with severe depression symptoms but don't work any better than placebo in mild cases. In a letter to The New York Times, Weill Cornell psychiatry professor Dr. Richard Friedman derided the research for including only two drugs and for excluding studies that screened out placebo responders.

Two of the researchers defended their methodology, saying many approved antidepressants vary little in effectiveness and that their aim was to estimate effects of medications vs. placebos.

Share this article:
close

Next Article in Features

Email Newsletters

More in Features

Antidote: On Cystic Fibrosis treatments

Antidote: On Cystic Fibrosis treatments

Recent treatments in CF, including the inhaled antibiotic Tobramycin, have increased lifespan well into adulthood.

The $3 generic and the $1,000 pill: pharma outsiders just don't get it

The $3 generic and the $1,000 pill: pharma ...

What do you call the people who treat medical breakthroughs as if they were bank heists? Malicious? Uninformed? Not with it?

Leadership Exchange Uncut : The Agency-Client Relationship

Leadership Exchange Uncut : The Agency-Client Relationship

Click the above link to access MM&M's first Leadership Exchange Uncut e-book, "The Agency-Client Relationship"