JAMA analysis stirs debate

Share this article:
A JAMA analysis questioning the effectiveness of antidepressants has renewed debate.

The meta-analysis found that antidepressents are useful for those with severe depression symptoms but don't work any better than placebo in mild cases. In a letter to The New York Times, Weill Cornell psychiatry professor Dr. Richard Friedman derided the research for including only two drugs and for excluding studies that screened out placebo responders.

Two of the researchers defended their methodology, saying many approved antidepressants vary little in effectiveness and that their aim was to estimate effects of medications vs. placebos.

Share this article:
You must be a registered member of MMM to post a comment.
close

Next Article in Features

Email Newsletters

More in Features

Read the complete September 2014 Digital Edition

Read the complete September 2014 Digital Edition

Click the above link to access the complete Digital Edition of the August 2014 issue of MM&M, with all text, charts and pictures.

Medical marketing needs mainstream Mad Men

Medical marketing needs mainstream Mad Men

Agencies must generate emotional resonance with the target audience, not unlike Apple, Pepsi or Nike

Are discounts cutting out co-pays?

GSK's decision to cut Advair's price spurred some PBMs to put it back on formulary. Will drugmaker discounts diminish the need for loyalty programs? How can these programs stay relevant beyond giving co-pay assistance?