JAMA analysis stirs debate

Share this article:
A JAMA analysis questioning the effectiveness of antidepressants has renewed debate.

The meta-analysis found that antidepressents are useful for those with severe depression symptoms but don't work any better than placebo in mild cases. In a letter to The New York Times, Weill Cornell psychiatry professor Dr. Richard Friedman derided the research for including only two drugs and for excluding studies that screened out placebo responders.

Two of the researchers defended their methodology, saying many approved antidepressants vary little in effectiveness and that their aim was to estimate effects of medications vs. placebos.

Share this article:
You must be a registered member of MMM to post a comment.
close

Next Article in Features

Email Newsletters

MM&M EBOOK: PATIENT ACCESS

Patient access to pharmaceuticals is a tale of two worlds—affordability has improved for the majority, while the minority is hampered by cost, distribution and red tape. To provide marketers with a well-rounded perspective, MM&M presents this e-book chock full of key insights. Click here to access it.

More in Features

Read the complete October 2014 Digital Edition

Read the complete October 2014 Digital Edition

Click the above link to access the complete Digital Edition of the October 2014 issue of MM&M, with all text, charts and pictures.

Predicting your pink slip

Predicting your pink slip

Any time a firm needs to save money, high-salaried executives are targets

Private View: New ways to engage with customers

Private View: New ways to engage with customers

These healthcare social media campaigns successfully use emotion, altruism and the human desire to "brand" oneself to get customers engaged.