Merck not responsible in Illinois Vioxx case

Share this article:
An Illinois jury Tuesday ruled Merck’s withdrawn painkiller Vioxx was not responsible for causing a 52-year-old woman’s fatal heart attack and awarded no damages in the case. Plaintiff Frank Schwaller sued Merck after his wife Patricia, took Vioxx for 20 months for shoulder pain before dying from a heart attack in August 2003. Schwaller’s lawyers alleged that Vioxx was defectively designed, inadequately tested, dangerous to human health, and lacked proper warnings, which subjected users to risks of heart attack, stroke and other illnesses. Merck argued Mrs. Schwaller’s preexisting risk factors – a family history of heart disease, morbid obesity, diabetes, high blood pressure, and sedentary lifestyle – were responsible for her sudden cardiac death. “The combination of these risk factors put her at increased risk for sudden cardiac death, having nothing to do with Vioxx,” said Dan Ball of the St. Louis firm Bryan Cave LLP, Merck's lead attorney in the case. In trials that have reached a jury verdict, Merck, so far, has won 10 and lost five.
Share this article:

Email Newsletters

More in News

In sunny world of LASIK marketers, a dark underbelly

In sunny world of LASIK marketers, a dark ...

Last week, the former FDA branch chief who originally approved LASIK machines asked FDA to reconsider its denial last month of his petition to ban these devices.

BMS Q2 sales slip, Eliquis, Yervoy soar

BMS Q2 sales slip, Eliquis, Yervoy soar

The company attributed part of the Eliquis boost to the BMS-Pfizer DTC and education efforts.

Gilead, Merck HCV marketing battle may be on horizon

Gilead, Merck HCV marketing battle may be on ...

Disclosed in its earnings report yesterday, Gilead may have a card up its sleeve to counter Merck's experimental hep. C combo regimen.