Merck wins Alabama Vioxx case

Share this article:
Alabama state court jurors ruled in Merck’s favor Friday, rejecting the claims of a plaintiff who blamed the drugmaker’s withdrawn painkiller Vioxx for his heart attack in 2001. The verdict marks the second time in three days that a jury has sided with Merck in a trial over Vioxx. A federal court in New Orleans ruled in favor of Merck Wednesday. “Juries continue to determine that Merck acted responsibly in its research of Vioxx and provided the appropriate information about Vioxx to patients and the medical community,” Merck EVP and general counsel Kenneth Frazier said in a statement. Attorneys for the plaintiff in the latest case, 57-year-old Chelsea, Ala. resident Gary Albright, told jurors he should receive as much as $5.75 million in his lawsuit filed last year. But jurors speaking with attorneys and reporters in the courtroom after the verdict said Albright had too many health problems before his heart attack to blame Vioxx, according to a report at WSJ.com. Merck has won four federal cases involving Vioxx and lost one. In state courts, the drugmaker has now won four cases and lost three. A case in New Jersey has been ordered to retrial after jurors sided with Merck.
Share this article:

Email Newsletters

More in News

House bill would speed approval once EU OKs same product

House bill would speed approval once EU OKs ...

The Speeding Access to Already Approved Pharmaceuticals Act of 2014 would require FDA to expedite the review of pharmaceuticals that are already approved by the European Union

Allergan touts reorg, plans to lay off 13% of workforce

Allergan touts reorg, plans to lay off 13% ...

Allergan's second-quarter earnings, and a new round of cuts, are now part of the Botox maker's record as it seeks to remain independent.

Shire, AbbVie join forces for $55B

Shire, AbbVie join forces for $55B

The deal includes a $1.6-billion fee if AbbVie tries to walk away.