No class-action suit over Vioxx, judge rules

Share this article:
A federal judge denied a request by users of Merck’s withdrawn painkiller Vioxx to pool thousands of personal injury cases into a single class-action lawsuit. The order, issued by US District Judge Eldon Fallon, means that Vioxx users who claim they were injured by the drug must sue only on their own behalf. Fallon did not rule on the possibility of separate class-actions suits for each state and the District of Columbia, though. Plaintiffs had proposed trying all of the cases under the laws in New Jersey, arguing that Merck should reasonably expect to follow the laws of the state where it is headquartered. Fallon ruled that it makes more sense to apply the law of each plaintiff's home state to that plaintiff's claims. In addition, although he wrote that he was "confident that common questions exist" among the more than 7,000 remaining cases, plaintiff allegations of Merck’s negligence in failing to warn doctors about Vioxx "necessarily turn on numerous individualized issues." Merck had vowed to fight each Vioxx case individually.
Share this article:

Email Newsletters

More in News

Meaningful use not linked to quality: study

Meaningful use not linked to quality: study

A recent study of physicians found no correlation between following EHR meaningful use requirements and providing consistently higher quality of care.

Lilly Q1 sales dip

Lilly Q1 sales dip

US sales fell 34% during the quarter, largely due to lower demand and lower prices for off-patent Cymbalta and Evista.

Gilead reaps huge HCV sales, payer fury

Gilead reaps huge HCV sales, payer fury

Sovaldi's debut has been marked by plenty of criticism from payers and lawmakers, but the hep. C drug's launch, now confirmed to be the fastest of all time, has also ...