Panel votes against AZ's olaparib

Share this article:
LOEs continue to buffet AstraZeneca
Panel votes against AZN's olaparib

An FDA advisory panel may have delivered AstraZeneca a bit of a setback Wednesday when it voted against accelerated approval for the drugmaker's experimental maintenance treatment olaparib for women with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer with the germline BRCA mutation, and who have complete or partial response to platinum-based chemotherapy.

The advisory committee said it wanted more data, which means AstraZeneca may have to wait for its Phase-III SOLO-2 study to wrap next year before the drug could move ahead, since the panel considered the Phase-II results insufficient for approval. The FDA does not have to accept the panel's recommendation, as seen by the difference in opinion over the Zogenix painkiller Zohydro, but often does.

The panel decision might not be a major note in a typical news cycle, but this time is a little different, in that  AstraZeneca's campaign bid to fend of a Pfizer takeover included a shout-out for the very drug the FDA panel has recommended be pushed off for consideration. AstraZeneca put olaparib's earning potential at $2 billion, a subset of the $45 billion in sales it said it was poised to take in by 2023.

The data showed olaparib patients experienced 11.2 months of progression-free survival, compared with 4.2 months among placebo patients. FDA panelists were concerned about possible underreporting of acute myeloid leukemia, which is when the bone marrow fails to create healthy blood cells, and questions about the ability to replicate results, among other concerns.

Leerink analyst Seamus Fernandez wrote in his Wednesday reaction that the panel's no vote was a surprise and that the vote could also indicate a high bar for PARP inhibitors.

Jefferies analyst Eun Yang disagrees, writing in a Thursday research note that the significance of the advisory committee's decision is limited to AstraZeneca. Yang wrote that her firm does not believe the no-vote foreshadows how BioMarin's experimental Phase-III PARP inhibitor BMN-673 will fare. Yang wrote that yesterday's discussion and decision “underscores the increasing weight on clinical meaningfulness of data . . . in a well-designed study.”

Share this article:
You must be a registered member of MMM to post a comment.
close

Next Article in Channel

Email Newsletters

MM&M Future Leaders


Register now

Early bird $1,950 before 31 October 2014

*Group discounts available on request 

MM&M EBOOK: PATIENT ACCESS

Patient access to pharmaceuticals is a tale of two worlds—affordability has improved for the majority, while the minority is hampered by cost, distribution and red tape. To provide marketers with a well-rounded perspective, MM&M presents this e-book chock full of key insights. Click here to access it.

More in Channel

Five things for pharma marketers to know: Monday, September 15

Five things for pharma marketers to know: ...

Pharma has sought 76 meetings with FDA over biosimilars; Gilead licenses Sovaldi to India generic drugmakers; Pfizer and Ranbaxy Lipitor lawsuit dismissed.

Liraglutide, aiming for new indication, gets new name

Liraglutide, aiming for new indication, gets new name

Why Novo Nordisk is choosing not to leverage Victoza's brand equity as it seeks a weight-loss indication for liraglutide.

Five things for pharma marketers to know: Friday, September 12

Five things for pharma marketers to know: Friday, ...

An FDA panel voted in favor of liraglutide for weight loss; Allergan investors backing an attempted takeover of the firm crossed a critical threshold; and 100 million health wearables are ...