Patient groups prompt NYU to pull ads

Share this article:

Bowing to outraged patient advocates, NYU Child Study Center said it will halt its controversial print and outdoor ads aimed at raising awareness of mental health problems in kids.

The ads, produced pro-bono by BBDO, take the form of ransom notes from a range of psychiatric disorders including autism, ADHD, Asperger syndrome, depression, bulimia and obsessive compulsive disorder. Patient groups said the ads, which appeared in regional publications and billboards, kiosks and construction sites around New York, reinforced damaging stereotypes, wrongly suggesting that children with autism and other psychiatric disorders are helpless and incapable of functioning in society.

The NYU Child Study Center's director, Harold Koplewicz, MD, said in a statement that while the ads got people's attention, they'd become a distraction from the issues they were meant to raise awareness of. 
Share this article:
You must be a registered member of MMM to post a comment.
close

Next Article in Features

Email Newsletters

MM&M EBOOK: PATIENT ACCESS

Patient access to pharmaceuticals is a tale of two worlds—affordability has improved for the majority, while the minority is hampered by cost, distribution and red tape. To provide marketers with a well-rounded perspective, MM&M presents this e-book chock full of key insights. Click here to access it.

More in Features

Read the complete September 2014 Digital Edition

Read the complete September 2014 Digital Edition

Click the above link to access the complete Digital Edition of the August 2014 issue of MM&M, with all text, charts and pictures.

Medical marketing needs mainstream Mad Men

Medical marketing needs mainstream Mad Men

Agencies must generate emotional resonance with the target audience, not unlike Apple, Pepsi or Nike

Are discounts cutting out co-pays?

GSK's decision to cut Advair's price spurred some PBMs to put it back on formulary. Will drugmaker discounts diminish the need for loyalty programs? How can these programs stay relevant beyond giving co-pay assistance?