Marketers weigh DTC policy pitfalls
“The ad fight is not over,” warned Jim Davidson of Polsinelli Shughart and the Advertising Coalition, noting that Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) continues to call an advertising moratorium a “top priority” on the argument that the risks of new drugs can't be fully known upon launch. The industry won a major victory in 2007 when the FDA Amendments Act was stripped of restrictions on advertising, but advocates of a crackdown are more powerful today. On the upside, said Davidson, Congress just gave FDA new powers to regulate advertising, and the industry would have allies among publishers and broadcasters already reeling from a deep advertising recession were Congress to threaten consumer ads.
Michael McCaughan, senior editor of Elsevier's RPM Report, said DTC foes he talks to aren't eager for another bite at a DTC ban, fearing that pharmas have an airtight First Amendment case. There's plenty of other ways they can clamp down, noted McCaughan, such as fines or mandating safety disclosures. And pharmas are just beginning to recognize the far-reaching effects of the FDA Amendments Act, which McCaughan said compares to the 1962 Kefauver Amendments in scope and ambition. “No longer is a drug approved or not,” said McCaughan. “Now it's about what kind of approval a drug will get. They've created a form of regulatory-driven personalized medicine.”
Healthcare reform is “a moment of truth and opportunity” for the drug industry, said Bill Novelli, chairman-emeritus of AARP. Novelli called on pharmas to cooperate with comparative effectiveness studies and said FDA should be empowered to approve ads for prescription drugs.