Pharmas are from Mars, Payers are from Venus

Share this article:
As payers scrutinize the bottom-line, they are continuing to redefine what constitutes worthwhile treatment. A report by PricewaterhouseCoopers said pharmas are coming up short on convincing payers that their drugs are worth the cost.

PwC said buyers have gotten more sophisticated—and picky—when it comes to determining formulary-worthiness. Sixty of the 100 polled now demand that drugs have significant clinical benefit over what's already on their formularies. Further, the research firm said FDA and personal doctor recommendations no longer carry the same heft—instead, payers are using information culled from electronic medical records, mobile devices and insurance claims, along with the old standbys, like agency input, when determining coverage policies.

And then there's the cost/benefit equation—45% of those polled said they want clear proof that a drug will save money by lowering the cost of overall patient care, and yet less than half of manufacturers' health economic studies analyze how their drugs can reduce the total cost of care.

PwC said drugmakers also need to be cognizant of the empowered patient. PwC found that looped-in patients are looking at their healthcare holistically, which is also exerting pressure on how payers think about their drug offerings. Or, as PwC put it, this means “drug manufacturers' discounts may carry less weight in formulary design. Rather, quality and outcomes become larger considerations.”

Among the intangibles is trust. PwC found that payers don't like simply being told what drugs are good for them—which in econospeak amounts to a “transactional relationship.” Instead, insurers and hospitals want to feel like they help determine what makes the most sense for their patients—a “collaborative relationship.” PwC said drug makers need to do more than offer discounts and rebates. Instead, it requires mutual data sharing of population profiles and bringing in payers when it comes to labeling information before pipeline items hit the FDA.
Share this article:
You must be a registered member of MMM to post a comment.

Email Newsletters

MM&M Future Leaders


Register now

Early bird $1,950 before 31 October 2014

*Group discounts available on request 

MM&M EBOOK: PATIENT ACCESS

Patient access to pharmaceuticals is a tale of two worlds—affordability has improved for the majority, while the minority is hampered by cost, distribution and red tape. To provide marketers with a well-rounded perspective, MM&M presents this e-book chock full of key insights. Click here to access it.

More in Channel

Five things for pharma marketers to know: Monday, September 15

Five things for pharma marketers to know: ...

Pharma has sought 76 meetings with FDA over biosimilars; Gilead licenses Sovaldi to India generic drugmakers; Pfizer and Ranbaxy Lipitor lawsuit dismissed.

Liraglutide, aiming for new indication, gets new name

Liraglutide, aiming for new indication, gets new name

Why Novo Nordisk is choosing not to leverage Victoza's brand equity as it seeks a weight-loss indication for liraglutide.

Five things for pharma marketers to know: Friday, September 12

Five things for pharma marketers to know: Friday, ...

An FDA panel voted in favor of liraglutide for weight loss; Allergan investors backing an attempted takeover of the firm crossed a critical threshold; and 100 million health wearables are ...