Study: OTC ads are so over risk info

Share this article:
Reality stars hawk allergy drugs
Reality stars hawk allergy drugs
A study of advertising for OTC switches found that presentation of risk information plummeted once the products advertised escaped the purview of the FDA.

The study, reported in the Journal of the American Medical Association, looked at print and broadcast ads – 133 in all -- for four products in the 24 months before and six months after they went OTC, including: Schering-Plough's Claritin (loratidine, which went OTC in 2002); AstraZeneca's Prilosec (omeprazole, OTC as of 2004); GSK's Alli (orlistat, OTC in 2007); and McNeil's Zyrtec (cetirizine, 2008). They found that while presentation of benefits ticked up a notch after the switch, going from 83% to 97%, presentation of potential harms sank from 70% to just 11%.

"With the exception of print advertisements for orlistat, no post-switch advertisements mentioned contra-indications or adverse effects," wrote the study's authors. Post-switch, just half of ads mentioned the generic name of the drug, compared to nearly all for the prescription-only period.

The study's authors noted that after an OTC switch, regulatory authority over advertising of a drug switches from FDA to the FTC, which “holds drug advertisements to the same standards as any consumer product: it applies a ‘reasonable consumer' standard of truthfulness and non-deception that does not require any balancing of potential benefits and harms.”

FDA advertising standards, they argued, are inconsistently enforced and frequently inadequate, but “DTCA after OTC switch presents even less information for making an informed decision, at a time when consumers must have more knowledge of whether medications' potential benefits are worth their risks and costs. Pharmaceuticals do not lose their capacity of harm after moving from behind the pharmacist's counter to in front of it; misuse of OTC drugs remains a major cause of emergency department visits, hospitalization and death.”

Four of the study's authors were at Brigham and Women's Hospital, while a fifth works for CVS Caremark. The study's lead author, Dr. Jeremy Greene, is now at Johns Hopkins University.
Share this article:
You must be a registered member of MMM to post a comment.

Next Article in Channel

Email Newsletters


Patient access to pharmaceuticals is a tale of two worlds—affordability has improved for the majority, while the minority is hampered by cost, distribution and red tape. To provide marketers with a well-rounded perspective, MM&M presents this e-book chock full of key insights. Click here to access it.

More in Channel

Five things for pharma marketers to know: Monday, September 15

Five things for pharma marketers to know: ...

Pharma has sought 76 meetings with FDA over biosimilars; Gilead licenses Sovaldi to India generic drugmakers; Pfizer and Ranbaxy Lipitor lawsuit dismissed.

Liraglutide, aiming for new indication, gets new name

Liraglutide, aiming for new indication, gets new name

Why Novo Nordisk is choosing not to leverage Victoza's brand equity as it seeks a weight-loss indication for liraglutide.

Five things for pharma marketers to know: Friday, September 12

Five things for pharma marketers to know: Friday, ...

An FDA panel voted in favor of liraglutide for weight loss; Allergan investors backing an attempted takeover of the firm crossed a critical threshold; and 100 million health wearables are ...