Supremes bolster preemption defense

Share this article:

In a major test of the preemption principle, the US Supreme Court ruled 8-1 that patients can't file common-law claims challenging the safety and effectiveness of an FDA-approved medical device.

The case, Riegel v. Medtronic, involved a suit by the family of a man injured when a balloon catheter made by Medtronic burst while he was undergoing angioplasty after suffering a heart attack.

Writing for the majority, Justice Antonin Scalia said “Premarket approval is a ‘rigorous' process” that should preempt state laws.

The lone dissenter was Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

Share this article:
You must be a registered member of MMM to post a comment.
 

Did you miss January's Top 40 Healthcare Transformers issue? Read how these inventors, strategists, entrepreneurs and wonks are challenging, disrupting and otherwise transforming the healthcare business. And join us April 30 to honor them at the Transforming Healthcare Dinner. Click here.