To handle media changes, more change is needed

Share this article:
To handle media changes, more change is needed
To handle media changes, more change is needed
Tony Plohoros
Principal, 6 Degrees

Few would argue that earned media is a powerful tool for reaching target stakeholders. Five years of healthcare journalists' insights confirm that they want more help from PR practitioners if they're to consider carrying our messages.

Journalists' views have changed remarkably little during the time my firm has been surveying them. While I was initially disappointed by this lack of drama, I realized the real news is that what journalists continue telling us may fall on deaf ears.

Among some of our more troubling findings that have remained fairly consistent:

• there's more pressure on journalists to produce, and less time to report stories

• a number of companies and organizations aren't doing a good job working with the media

• PR firms get poor marks for the quality of their pitches and mediocre grades for respecting journalists' time and overall experiences working with them

These findings matter because they tell us that many PR pros hinder their clients' and employers' ability to reach target audiences through the media...and  likely impair their organizations' reputations at the same time. This isn't an indictment of PR pros who work with the media. Far from it. There are many extremely competent practitioners from whom I've learned much.

The good news:  journalists have given us a roadmap for how to effectively work with them.

If you're hiring a PR agency, make sure the firm is suited to represent you to the media and help you achieve your objectives. Ask firms you're considering:

• who will interact with journalists on your behalf (including their level of experience with media and your industry);

• what relationships that person has with journalists at outlets that reach your targets (get names and numbers); and

• who will draft your written materials (ask for samples)

For organizations shoring up their in-house efforts, the process is easier:  ask some key journalists for thoughts about their interactions with the organization. Given the scores that organizations receive in our survey, it's apparent that some executives don't want to hear what journalists would say. Too bad. They're leaving their ability to drive business results and their organizations' reputations at risk.

Share this article:
You must be a registered member of MMM to post a comment.

Email Newsletters


Patient access to pharmaceuticals is a tale of two worlds—affordability has improved for the majority, while the minority is hampered by cost, distribution and red tape. To provide marketers with a well-rounded perspective, MM&M presents this e-book chock full of key insights. Click here to access it.

More in Features

Read the complete September 2014 Digital Edition

Read the complete September 2014 Digital Edition

Click the above link to access the complete Digital Edition of the August 2014 issue of MM&M, with all text, charts and pictures.

Medical marketing needs mainstream Mad Men

Medical marketing needs mainstream Mad Men

Agencies must generate emotional resonance with the target audience, not unlike Apple, Pepsi or Nike

Are discounts cutting out co-pays?

GSK's decision to cut Advair's price spurred some PBMs to put it back on formulary. Will drugmaker discounts diminish the need for loyalty programs? How can these programs stay relevant beyond giving co-pay assistance?