Waxman alleges Troy blocked Plan B decision

Share this article:
Before he left the FDA 18 months ago, former chief counsel Dan Troy failed to complete a necessary legal review of Barr Laboratories' proposed under-16 sales restriction on over-the-counter Plan B, requested by FDA reviewers eight months earlier, according to a March 9 letter to the agency from Henry A. Waxman (D-CA).

Waxman's letter charges that the FDA set Barr up for Plan B's defeat by convincing it to amend its application to propose the under-16 restriction that it knew it would later call too “difficult and novel” to be approved without indefinite further consideration—“a regulatory Catch 22,” as Waxman called it.

His seven-page letter cited internal FDA e-mails suggesting Troy's office was repeatedly reminded of the need for the legal review and of its urgency due to a six-month statutory deadline on Barr's application, a deadline the FDA failed to meet. These documents “reveal that in addition to having created the situation it now protests as too complex to solve, FDA has seriously mischaracterized its consideration of the regulatory questions at stake,” Waxman wrote.
Share this article:
You must be a registered member of MMM to post a comment.

Next Article in Features

Email Newsletters


Patient access to pharmaceuticals is a tale of two worlds—affordability has improved for the majority, while the minority is hampered by cost, distribution and red tape. To provide marketers with a well-rounded perspective, MM&M presents this e-book chock full of key insights. Click here to access it.

More in Features

Read the complete September 2014 Digital Edition

Read the complete September 2014 Digital Edition

Click the above link to access the complete Digital Edition of the August 2014 issue of MM&M, with all text, charts and pictures.

Medical marketing needs mainstream Mad Men

Medical marketing needs mainstream Mad Men

Agencies must generate emotional resonance with the target audience, not unlike Apple, Pepsi or Nike

Are discounts cutting out co-pays?

GSK's decision to cut Advair's price spurred some PBMs to put it back on formulary. Will drugmaker discounts diminish the need for loyalty programs? How can these programs stay relevant beyond giving co-pay assistance?