Waxman hearing probes IRB shopping, GAO sting

Share this article:
Drug companies that shop among competing institutional review boards, especially those that operate for profit, to get the most favorable clinical study results, and a Government Accountability Office “sting” operation against one of them came under scrutiny at a March hearing of the House Energy and Commerce Committee's Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee, headed by Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA).

The GAO reported on an investigation conducted on Coast IRB after subcommittee members learned about IRB troubles during Ketek hearings in 2007, where it became known that an IRB allowed the study of Sanofi-Aventis' antibiotic to continue without examining reports about fraud it had received. 

The GAO said it created a fictitious company and and then shopped for an IRB that would approve a clinical trial with the product. Investigators then prepared an erroneous and sloppy protocol for three IRBs they had identified as not having stringent documentation requirements. 
Share this article:
You must be a registered member of MMM to post a comment.
close

Next Article in Features

Email Newsletters

MM&M EBOOK: PATIENT ACCESS

Patient access to pharmaceuticals is a tale of two worlds—affordability has improved for the majority, while the minority is hampered by cost, distribution and red tape. To provide marketers with a well-rounded perspective, MM&M presents this e-book chock full of key insights. Click here to access it.

More in Features

Is your marketing strategy stuck in 2005?

Is your marketing strategy stuck in 2005?

It is not enough to just have a killer black book or Rolodex. The market needs agile, swift marketing

Is guidance stifling social media?

Recent FDA draft guidance was meant to help companies create FDA-compliant tweets and handle third-party misinformation on the web. What other obstacles lie in the path of effective social media use?

FDA social media guides draw flak

FDA social media guides draw flak

Two FDA guidance documents on how health product manufacturers may participate in social media have drawn criticism from industry and consumer groups.