Web Watch

Share this article:
It seems like there are thousands of web communities online these days. A look into these communities, how they work and how people behave in them is the subject of new research conducted in October 2008 by Rubicon Consulting. They found that most of the people in these communities are what they call lurkers; people that read or observe what's going on but they don't make any contributions to the community. Lurkers make up an amazing 90% of these visitors. Only about 9% of users contribute comments, reviews or offer advice from time to time but they generally don't bother to jump into the fray all that often. It's the 1% of the people that account for most of the contributions in any given community. Web 2.0 veterans call this “participation inequality.”

Online communities have a substantial amount of influence on almost all web users. Product reviews, visitor comments and recommendations posted online are second to word-of-mouth as a way to drive sales for all web users. The scary part is that so many of the comments, advice and postings come from only 1% of the community. Two or three knuckleheads with a laptop can have a profound influence by posting messages and responding to questions that all the lurkers absorb as factual user-generated content. And that's fine if this 1% is really knowledgeable and honest. But what if they are hired by the local plastic surgeon or a state tourism agency to say nice things about their client?

 While most online communities are self-policing and these enthusiastic community members are often exposed as undercover pitchmen, you have to wonder if it's just a matter of time before they perfect their craft a little and influence the masses. 

Dan McKillen is president & CEO of the HealthDay news service
Share this article:
You must be a registered member of MMM to post a comment.

Email Newsletters


Patient access to pharmaceuticals is a tale of two worlds—affordability has improved for the majority, while the minority is hampered by cost, distribution and red tape. To provide marketers with a well-rounded perspective, MM&M presents this e-book chock full of key insights. Click here to access it.

More in Features

Read the complete September 2014 Digital Edition

Read the complete September 2014 Digital Edition

Click the above link to access the complete Digital Edition of the August 2014 issue of MM&M, with all text, charts and pictures.

Medical marketing needs mainstream Mad Men

Medical marketing needs mainstream Mad Men

Agencies must generate emotional resonance with the target audience, not unlike Apple, Pepsi or Nike

Are discounts cutting out co-pays?

GSK's decision to cut Advair's price spurred some PBMs to put it back on formulary. Will drugmaker discounts diminish the need for loyalty programs? How can these programs stay relevant beyond giving co-pay assistance?