When orals attack: how to ensure product access

Share this article:
William Renzo
William Renzo
William Renzo
SVP, dir. of client services, Ogilvy Healthworld Payer Marketing

Therapeutic categories long dominated by IV-infused therapies face oral-product competition. Gilenya's launch into the IV-infused/self-injection dominated multiple sclerosis market is an example. In this scenario, manufacturers of the oral newcomers face some complexities:

• Will adherence rates be on par with IV-infused/self-injectable competitors?

• Is specialty or retail pharmacy the most appropriate distribution channel?

• How should the oral product be priced to effectively compete with injected therapies?

• Will co-pays or coinsurance be the mechanism most plans use to share costs with patients?

• What patient support services will be required?

• What office manager, nurse, and physician education specific to reimbursement and patient services will be necessary?

When oral-dominated therapeutic categories face IV-infused competition, manufacturers of the new infused therapies face different issues:

• Where will the IV-infused product most likely be administered—physician's office, standalone infusion center, hospital? How will these dynamics impact targeting and promotion?

• Do targeted MDs possess the capabilities to administer IV-infused products in the office? If not, what level of education is needed to ensure physicians understand the dynamics surrounding the product's use?

• What benefits will the new product possess over the oral agents that should be considered when establishing price?

• How will health plans manage the IV-infused therapy? Which stakeholders and processes are needed for advocacy, and what must be understood to ensure optimal reimbursement?

• What Medicare Carrier and Contractor Advisory Committee processes are important to understand to streamline reimbursement?

Many areas of the commercialization strategy and marketing mix are impacted, including distribution, contracts and pricing, health economics and outcomes research, HCP and consumer promotion, training, and site-of-care marketing. With the evolution of science and healthcare reform, remaining a step ahead of these paradigm shifts may prove the difference between leaders and followers.

Share this article:
close

Next Article in Features

Email Newsletters

More in Features

Headliner: Proteus CEO takes an original path

Headliner: Proteus CEO takes an original path

Andrew Thompson, CEO, Proteus Digital Health

Leadership Exchange: How Do We Get Beyond the Pill?

Leadership Exchange: How Do We Get Beyond the ...

As its focus moves from manufacturing to service, pharma needs to partner with healthcare neophytes as well as established players. James Chase asks six experts to assess the risks and ...

FDA and off-label uses: a balancing act

FDA and off-label uses: a balancing act

FDA's current re-examination of its off-label promotion policies in light of the First Amendment is a delicate balancing act between its rock-solid traditional enforcement posture and a diverse new electronic ...