User-fee inaction could cause logjam

Share this article:

If Congress does with FDA user fee bills this year what it did in 2007—and in all likelihood it will—the prospects for a huge new products-review backlog are “frightening,” according to FDA Matters editor Steven Grossman. “As a general precaution,” he wrote in a January 30 commentary, “FDA left many staff positions vacant during 2007, just in case the user fee monies were not renewed. As required by law, FDA eventually issued layoff notices to employees it could not pay if user fee monies were not available on October 1, 2007.”

This led to a review backlog starting in the second half of 2007, Grossman writes. “It seems more than a coincidence that the problems started at the same time as the disruption caused by the new law.”

This year, he says, Congress must handle twice as many bills before July 1—drug and device renewals, and bills for generic drugs and biosimilars/interchangeable biologics. “If 2012 becomes a repeat of 2007, then FDA will find itself under withering criticism this year for not reviewing innovative drug applications in a timely fashion.”

Grossman concludes that “Congress needs to commit to speed up the process, minimize amendments, and make new provisions effective six months or a year after enactment. ”
Share this article:
You must be a registered member of MMM to post a comment.
close

Next Article in Features

Email Newsletters

More in Features

Read the complete September 2014 Digital Edition

Read the complete September 2014 Digital Edition

Click the above link to access the complete Digital Edition of the August 2014 issue of MM&M, with all text, charts and pictures.

Medical marketing needs mainstream Mad Men

Medical marketing needs mainstream Mad Men

Agencies must generate emotional resonance with the target audience, not unlike Apple, Pepsi or Nike

Are discounts cutting out co-pays?

GSK's decision to cut Advair's price spurred some PBMs to put it back on formulary. Will drugmaker discounts diminish the need for loyalty programs? How can these programs stay relevant beyond giving co-pay assistance?