Decision delayed over NH state Rx data

A federal judge took an unusual step last month of asking lawyers to critique a draft of his factual findings before ruling in IMS Health and Verispan’s high-profile challenge to New Hampshire’s state law limiting drug company access to doctors’ prescribing habits.

The Associated Press reported that Judge Paul Barbadoro asked lawyers for both sides in the case to meet with him to review his proposed factual findings, apparently in hopes to address some objections before ruling and providing the 1st US Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston with a clear decision.

Barbadoro cautioned that no one should try to predict his ruling from the draft, but some
of his comments showed his skepticism about key arguments—including the state’s contention that detailing drives up drug prices.

“If reasonable medical people disagree,” about the merits of various drugs for the same medical condition, “you have a stronger argument that speech restrictions are dangerous,” Barbadoro said. He expects to rule this month.  

You must be a registered member of MMM to post a comment.
 

Did you miss January's Top 40 Healthcare Transformers issue? Read how these inventors, strategists, entrepreneurs and wonks are challenging, disrupting and otherwise transforming the healthcare business. And join us April 30 to honor them at the Transforming Healthcare Dinner. Click here.